Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Even if we win, we lose

I have to say, I don’t quite understand why conservatives get so paranoid about “leftists” coming in and changing everything. Take the US Democrats, with their unassailable “super majority” in Congress and their spectacularly popular new President, and how they’ve managed to piss away meaningful health care reform and pretty much completely capitulated to the morally-bankrupt ideologues the voters explicitly rejected less than a year ago.

Watch Jon Stewart almost weep with disbelief:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c Democratic Super Majority www.thedailyshow.com Daily Show
Full Episodes Political Humor Ron Paul Interview

(Although the embedded video might not work for Australians, you can watch it by clicking on the link.)

Seriously, American “democracy” is even more broken than I previously thought – even with the limited choice the people get, their wishes are still ignored. And yet it’s those they rejected, who are nonetheless getting their own stupid, nasty, destructive, incomprehensibly selfish and sociopathic way, who are squealing like stuck pigs.

Come on, righties – at least when your guys in, they do what you want. They cut taxes for the rich and invade other countries. They certainly don’t pander to us, their opponents. Ours, they pander to you, too. Heads you win, tails we lose.

You could at least be gracious about it.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

My tears flow after reading this article about the American Nightmare in California

My tears flow after reading this article about the American Nightmare in California. Yes I love USA, Democracy and Obama. (I give my eldest son name after the President  Jimmy Carter. (During the interview examination for the best student from the 2nd. M.B.,B.S. Senior, the first question I was asked was what important thing is happening today? I replied proudly and quickly that Jimmy Carter was going to swan in as the new President of USA. I even told the examiners who asked me whether I was sure that I even bought a state lottery ticket ticket and wrote on the ticket,”Congratulations and Welcome Mr Jimmy Carter”. (Sorry Allah, I do not know that buying lottary ticket is haram at that time. Please forgive me for that sin and all the other sins I had committed, knowingly and unknowingly.)

(By the way, when we arrived here and got our third child, we decided to call him Md Azlan because DYMM Azlan Shah was the King of Malaysia. We were proud of his carriculum vitae as he was the retired Chief Justice or Lord President of Malaysia. Alhamdullilah, that son, Md Azalan’s PMR, SPM and “A” level results are very good and is now trying to get into a Medical College. Although he was born here and his extracurricular activities are very good, we need to pray hard to Allah to give us strength and help for his education.)

Never mind, let us continue about him latr in anothr posting and now read the proper article which made me cry….

Patients without medical insurance wait for treatment in the Forum, a music arena in Inglewood, Los Angeles. The 1,500 free places were filled by 4am. Photograph: John Moore/Getty Images

California has a special place in the American psyche. It is the Golden State: a playground of the rich and famous with perfect weather. It symbolises a lifestyle of sunshine, swimming pools and the Hollywood dream factory.

But the state that was once held up as the epitome of the boundless opportunities of America has collapsed. From its politics to its economy to its environment and way of life, California is like a patient on life support. At the start of summer the state government was so deeply in debt that it began to issue IOUs instead of wages. Its unemployment rate has soared to more than 12%, the highest figure in 70 years. Desperate to pay off a crippling budget deficit, California is slashing spending in education and healthcare, laying off vast numbers of workers and forcing others to take unpaid leave. In a state made up of sprawling suburbs the collapse of the housing bubble has impoverished millions and kicked tens of thousands of families out of their homes. Its political system is locked in paralysis and the two-term rule of former movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger is seen as a disaster – his approval ratings having sunk to levels that would make George W Bush blush. The crisis is so deep that Professor Kenneth Starr, who has written an acclaimed history of the state, recently declared: “California is on the verge of becoming the first failed state in America.”

Outside the Forum in Inglewood, near downtown Los Angeles, California has already failed. The scene is reminiscent of the fallout from Hurricane Katrina, as crowds of impoverished citizens stand or lie aimlessly on the hot tarmac of the centre’s car park. It is 10am, and most have already been here for hours. They have come for free healthcare: a travelling medical and dental clinic has set up shop in the Forum (which usually hosts rock concerts) and thousands of the poor, the uninsured and the down-on-their-luck have driven for miles to be here.

The queue began forming at 1am. By 4am, the 1,500 spaces were already full and people were being turned away. On the floor of the Forum, root-canal surgeries are taking place. People are ferried in on cushions, hauled out of decrepit cars. Sitting propped up against a lamp post, waiting for her number to be called, is Debbie Tuua, 33. It is her birthday, but she has taken a day off work to bring her elderly parents to the Forum, and they have driven through the night to get here. They wait in a car as the heat of the day begins to rise. “It is awful for them, but what choice do we have?” Tuua says. “I have no other way to get care to them.”

Yet California is currently cutting healthcare, slashing the “Healthy Families” programme that helped an estimated one million of its poorest children. Los Angeles now has a poverty rate of 20%. Other cities across the state, such as Fresno and Modesto, have jobless rates that rival Detroit’s. In order to pass its state budget, California’s government has had to agree to a deal that cuts billions of dollars from education and sacks 60,000 state employees. Some teachers have launched a hunger strike in protest. California’s education system has become so poor so quickly that it is now effectively failing its future workforce. The percentage of 19-year-olds at college in the state dropped from 43% to 30% between 1996 and 2004, one of the highest falls ever recorded for any developed world economy. California’s schools are ranked 47th out of 50 in the nation. Its government-issued bonds have been ranked just above “junk”.

Some of the state’s leading intellectuals believe this collapse is a disaster that will harm Californians for years to come. “It will take a while for this self-destructive behaviour to do its worst damage,” says Robert Hass, a professor at Berkeley and a former US poet laureate, whose work has often been suffused with the imagery of the Californian way of life.

Now, incredibly, California, which has been a natural target for immigration throughout its history, is losing people. Between 2004 and 2008, half a million residents upped sticks and headed elsewhere. By 2010, California could lose a congressman because its population will have fallen so much – an astonishing prospect for a state that is currently the biggest single political entity in America. Neighbouring Nevada has launched a mocking campaign to entice businesses away, portraying Californian politicians as monkeys, and with a tag-line jingle that runs: “Kiss your assets goodbye!” You know you have a problem when Nevada – famed for nothing more than Las Vegas, casinos and desert – is laughing at you.

This matters, too. Much has been made globally of the problems of Ireland and Iceland. Yet California dwarfs both. It is the eighth largest economy in the world, with a population of 37 million. If it was an independent country it would be in the G8. And if it were a company, it would likely be declared bankrupt. That prospect might surprise many, but it does not come as news to Tuua, as she glances nervously into the warming sky, hoping her parents will not have to wait in the car through the heat of the day just to see a doctor. “It is so depressing. They both worked hard all their lives in this state and this is where they have ended up. It should not have to be this way,” she says.

It is impossible not to be impressed by the physical presence of Arnold Schwarzenegger when he walks into a room. He may appear slightly smaller than you imagine, but he’s just as powerful. This is, after all, the man who, before he was California’s governor, was the Terminator and Conan the Barbarian.

But even Schwarzenegger is humbled by the scale of the crisis. At a press conference in Sacramento to announce the final passing of a state budget, which would include billions of dollars of cuts, the governor speaks in uncharacteristically pensive terms. “It is clear that we do not know yet what the future holds. We are still in troubled waters,” he says quietly. He looks subdued, despite his sharp grey suit and bright pink tie.

Later, during a grilling by reporters, Schwarzenegger is asked an unusual question. As a gaggle of journalists begins to shout, one man’s voice quickly silences the others. “Do you ever feel like you’re watching the end of the California dream?” asks the reporter. It is clearly a personal matter for Schwarzenegger. After all, his life story has embodied it. He arrived virtually penniless from Austria, barely speaking English. He ended up a movie star, rich beyond his dreams, and finally governor, hanging Conan’s prop sword in his office. Schwarzenegger answers thoughtfully and at length. He hails his own experience and ends with a passionate rallying call in his still thickly accented voice.

“There is people that sometimes suggest that the American dream, or the Californian dream, is evaporating. I think it’s absolutely wrong. I think the Californian dream is as strong as ever,” he says, mangling the grammar but not the sentiment.

Looking back, it is easy to see where Schwarzenegger’s optimism sprung from. California has always been a special place, with its own idea of what could be achieved in life. There is no such thing as a British dream. Even within America, there is no Kansas dream or New Jersey dream. But for California the concept is natural. It has always been a place apart. It is of the American West, the destination point in a nation whose history has been marked by restless pioneers. It is the home of Hollywood, the nation’s very own fantasy land. Getting on a bus or a train or a plane and heading out for California has been a regular trope in hundreds of books, movies, plays, and in the popular imagination. It has been writ large in the national psyche as free from the racial divisions of the American South and the traditions and reserve of New England. It was America’s own America.

Michael Pollan, author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma and now an adopted Californian, remembers arriving here from his native New England. “In New England you would have to know people for 10 years before they let you in their home,” he says. “Here, when I took my son to his first play date, the mother invited me to a hot tub.”

Michael Levine is a Hollywood mover and shaker, shaping PR for a stable of A-list clients that once included Michael Jackson. Levine arrived in California 32 years ago. “The concept of the Californian dream was a certain quality of life,” he says. “It was experimentalism and creativity. California was a utopia.”

Levine arrived at the end of the state’s golden age, at a time when the dream seemed to have been transformed into reality. The 1950s and 60s had been boom-time in the American economy; jobs had been plentiful and development rapid. Unburdened by environmental concerns, Californian developers built vast suburbs beneath perpetually blue skies. Entire cities sprang from the desert, and orchards were paved over into playgrounds and shopping malls.

“They came here, they educated their kids, they had a pool and a house. That was the opportunity for a pretty broad section of society,” says Joel Kotkin, an urbanist at Chapman University, in Orange County. This was what attracted immigrants in their millions, flocking to industries – especially defence and aviation – that seemed to promise jobs for life. But the newcomers were mistaken. Levine, among millions of others, does not think California is a utopia now. “California is going to take decades to fix,” he says.

So where did it all wrong?

Few places embody the collapse of California as graphically as the city of Riverside. Dubbed “The Inland Empire”, it is an area in the southern part of the state where the desert has been conquered by mile upon mile of housing developments, strip malls and four-lane freeways. The tidal wave of foreclosures and repossessions that burst the state’s vastly inflated property bubble first washed ashore here. “We’ve been hit hard by foreclosures. You can see it everywhere,” says political scientist Shaun Bowler, who has lived in California for 20 years after moving here from his native England. The impact of the crisis ranges from boarded-up homes to abandoned swimming pools that have become a breeding ground for mosquitoes. Bowler’s sister, visiting from England, was recently taken to hospital suffering from an infected insect bite from such a pool. “You could say she was a victim of the foreclosure crisis, too,” he jokes.

But it is no laughing matter. One in four American mortgages that are “under water”, meaning they are worth more than the home itself, are in California. In the Central Valley town of Merced, house prices have crashed by 70%. Two Democrat politicians have asked for their districts to be declared disaster zones, because of the poor economic conditions caused by foreclosures. In one city near Riverside, a squatter’s camp of newly homeless labourers sleeping in their vehicles has grown up in a supermarket car park – the local government has provided toilets and a mobile shower. In the Los Angeles suburb of Pacoima, one in nine homeowners are now in default on their mortgage, and the local priest, the Rev John Lasseigne, has garnered national headlines – swapping saving souls to saving houses, by negotiating directly with banks on behalf of his parishioners.

For some campaigners and advocates against suburban sprawl and car culture, it has been a bitter triumph. “Let the gloating begin!” says James Kunstler, author of The Long Emergency, a warning about the high cost of the suburban lifestyle. Others see the end of the housing boom as a man-made disaster akin to a mass hysteria, but with no redemption in sight. “If California was an experiment then it was an experiment of mass irresponsibility – and that has failed,” says Michael Levine.

Nowhere is the economic cost of California’s crisis writ larger than in the Central Valley town of Mendota, smack in the heart of a dusty landscape of flat, endless fields of fruit and vegetables. The town, which boldly terms itself “the cantaloup capital of the world”, now has an unemployment rate of 38%. That is expected to rise above 50% as the harvest ends and labourers are laid off. City officials hold food giveaways every two weeks. More than 40% of the town’s people live below the poverty level. Shops have shut, restaurants have closed, drugs and alcohol abuse have become a problem.

Standing behind the counter of his DVD and grocery store, former Mendota mayor Joseph Riofrio tells me it breaks his heart to watch the town sink into the mire. His father had built the store in the 1950s and constructed a solid middle-class life around it, to raise his family. Now Riofrio has stopped selling booze in a one-man bid to curb the social problems breaking out all around him.

“It is so bad, but it has now got to the point where we are getting used to it being like this,” he says. Riofrio knows his father’s achievements could not be replicated today. The state that once promised opportunities for working men and their families now promises only desperation. “He could not do what he did again. That chance does not exist now,” Riofrio says.

Outside, in a shop that Riofrio’s grandfather built, groups of unemployed men play pool for 25 cents a game. Near every one of the town’s liquor stores others lie slumped on the pavements, drinking their sorrows away. Mendota is fighting for survival against heavy odds. The town of 7,000 souls has seen 2,000 people leave in the past two years. But amid the crisis there are a few sparks of hope for the future. California has long been an incubator of fresh ideas, many of which spread across the country. If America emerges from its crisis a greener, more economically and politically responsible nation, it is likely that renewal will have begun here. The clues to California’s salvation – and perhaps even the country as a whole – are starting to emerge.

Take Anthony “Van” Jones, a man now in the vanguard of the movement to build a future green economy, creating millions of jobs, solving environmental problems and reducing climate change at a stroke. It is a beguiling vision and one that Jones conceived in the northern Californian city of Oakland. He began political life as an anti-poverty campaigner, but gradually combined that with environmentalism, believing that greening the economy could also revitalise it and lift up the poor. He founded Green for All as an advocacy group and published a best-selling book, The Green Collar Economy. Then Obama came to power and Jones got the call from the White House. In just a few years, his ideas had spread from the streets of Oakland to White House policy papers. Jones was later ousted from his role, but his ideas remain. Green jobs are at the forefront of Obama’s ideas on both the economy and the environment.

Jones believes California will once more change itself, and then change the nation. “California remains a beacon of hope… This is a new time for a new direction to grow a new society and a new economy,” Jones has said.

It is already happening. California may have sprawling development and awful smog, but it leads the way in environmental issues. Arnold Schwarzenegger was seen as a leading light, taking the state far ahead of the federal government on eco-issues. The number of solar panels in the state has risen from 500 a decade ago to more than 50,000 now. California generates twice as much energy from solar power as all the other US states combined. Its own government is starting to turn on the reckless sprawl that has marked the state’s development.

California’s attorney-general, Jerry Brown, recently sued one county government for not paying enough attention to global warming when it came to urban planning. Even those, like Kotkin, who are sceptical about the end of suburbia, think California will develop a new model for modern living: comfortable, yes, but more modest and eco-friendly. Kotkin, who is writing an eagerly anticipated book about what America will look like in 2050, thinks much of it will still resemble the bedrock of the Californian dream: sturdy, wholesome suburbs for all – just done more responsibly. “We will still live in suburbs. You work with the society you have got. The question is how we make them more sustainable,” he says.

Even the way America eats is being changed in California. Every freeway may be lined with fast-food outlets, but California is also the state of Alice Waters, the guru of the slow-food movement, who inspired Michelle Obama to plant a vegetable garden in the White House. She thinks the state is changing its values. “The crisis is bringing us back to our senses. We had adopted a fast and easy way of living, but we are moving away from that now,” she says.

There is hope in politics, too. There is a growing movement to call for a constitutional convention that could redraw the way the state is governed. It could change how the state passes budgets and make the political system more open, recreating the lost middle ground. Recently, the powerful mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa, signed on to the idea. Gerrymandering, too, is set to take a hit. Next year Schwarzenegger will take steps to redraw some districts to make them more competitive, breaking the stranglehold of party politics. He wants district boundaries to be drawn up by impartial judges, not politicians. In previous times that would have been the equivalent of a turkey voting for Christmas. But now the bold move is seen for what it is: a necessary step to change things. And there is no denying that innovation is something that California does well.

Even in the most deprived corners of the state there is a sense that things can still turn around. California has always been able to reinvent itself, and some of its most hardcore critics still like the idea of it having a “dream”.

“I believe in California. It pains me at the moment to see it where it is, but I still believe in it,” said Michael Levine.

Perhaps more surprisingly, a fellow believer is to be found in Mendota in the shape of Joseph Riofrio. His shop operates as a sort of informal meeting place for the town. People drop in to chat, to get advice, or to buy a cold soft drink to relieve the unrelenting heat outside. The people are poor, many of them out of work, often hiring a bunch of DVDs as a cheap way of passing the time. But Riofrio sees them as a community, one that he grew up in. He is proud of his town and determined to stick it out. “This is a good place to live,” he says. “I want to be here when it turns around.” He is talking of the stricken town outside. But he could be describing the whole state.★

 

Obama and Iran

 

The Notion of Fact V. The Idea of Fiction: Iran – When President Obama Stated His Purpose, It wasn’t to Iran but to “Istayed”!   

By Jimmy M.

      A little bit over a week and a half ago, President Obama issued a clear message to Iran: come forward with your nuclear weapons program developments or face severe international consequences. This battle of two different approaches has been raging for decades now. Beginning from the overthrow of the Shah to the immediate crisis of the hostage situation, Iran and the US have never really seen eye to eye. This conflict has been heated, with the back and forth rhetoric used against each nation, and seems to be an issue that will see a use of force. This scene of force might be one not seen in global proportions for nearly 70 years. At an open lecture last year, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad discussed his views of the world in an auditorium full of Columbia University students. The talk sparked outrage but nowhere was there more outrage seen then when the President staked his claim. The tensions between the two nations are reminiscent of an old, familiar war, one where no troops were used and one that also captivated the entire world.

     This past week, a new chapter was added to those rising tensions when the United States provided evidence of a “hidden nuclear weapons bunker”. When the United States wagged its finger at Iran, it really opened the door for Iranians to be as hostile as Iraqis were when “Dubya” came to visit in December of last year. Unsurprisingly, the Iranian President’s response was not that different from the shoe-thrower. Iran remains defiant in the mists of global disapproval and international disgust. The French, who have reliably sided with the US in having talks with Iran, have expressed a strong desire for Iran to speak honestly and to put everything out on the table for the world to see. But, given that France is one of the few nations powered by nuclear materials, they are in no position to levy such charges. It is strange how France chimed in for this discussion of nuclear weapons and not the one involving Saddam.

     Anyway, I do believe that the way these events are playing out, are eerily similar to those of the first cold war. Iran is not the superpower that the Soviet Union was, but should they get their hands on such devastating technology, there is very few who would argue that they are indeed a superpower. Iran could deploy frightening methods of intimidation, like they were willing to do with the election protests of the summer. I just hope that the President does indeed have the support of the international community. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that he needs the backing of the UN council. My feelings for that committee remain the same and that is to be ever careful of a group that uses the “art of negotiation”. That tactic may lead to blackmail or even a matter of gaining leverage for an event that is being planned.

     The course of action the President should take is to stand firm on the Iran situation, but don’t become hotheaded about it and use the doctrine of the pre-emptive strike. That doctrine has hurt the US in the past and it continues to do so in the ongoing Iraq War. President Obama must not look at history and America’s WWII glories, he must create it. That cannot be created by launching the next world war. It must come from a direct source, a light upon the hill for the world to observe. The path to creating history must come by definitively resolving the Iranian threat using precise language. No double-talk, be a straight-shooter. Show Iran and the rest of the world that the United States, on such a matter as this, can be taken at its word. I might be a fool for expressing a wish that is impossible or unrealistic but dammit, it needs to be done. The world can’t continue to look at that faint light on its spoon, it needs to realize it is a reflection and that the real light is up above and has greater luminosity then the speck could ever possibly have.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

The origin of the t-shirt / L'origine della t-shirt

Questo straordinario capo d’abbigliamento che per molti anni ha vestito e sicuramente vestira’ giovani e meno giovani per i prossimi anni a venire, ritrova le proprie origini sin dal xx secolo, ma la sua affermazione su scala mondiale si e’ avuta solo dagli anni quaranta, quando la marina degli Stati Uniti d’ America sfrutto’ la shirt (maglia giro collo) come parte della divisa dei propri marinai. La maglia bianca dei soldati USA si diffuse poi largamente in Europa durante la seconda guerra mondiale. Tra i piu’ giovani la T- shirt diventa l’ indumento piu’ pratico da indossare, togliendo spazio all’uso della tradizionale camicia. Il taglio delle sue maniche le conferisce il caratteristico aspetto a T (specie quelle corte). Il tessuto utilizzato per la sua creazione e’ il filato o il cotone e in certi casi in fibbre sintetiche. Inevitabilmente, Hollywood ha avuto il piu grosso impatto nella classica “Tee”, cinematografando icone del cinema come Brando nel film “A streetcar named desire’(1951) e James Dean in “Rebel without a cause”(1955), dando un’ immagine dei vestitori di t-shirt come persone “cool” e “ribelli”.
Nei primi anni 50, diverse compagnie basate a Miami in Florida, iniziarono a decorare le t-shirt usando nomi di personggi del cinema in varie forme e caratteri. La prima compagnia a fondarsi e’ stata Tropix Togs, che si imposessa dell’originale licenza per Walt Disney, includendo Mickey Mouse and Davy Crockett. In seguito altre compagnie si innovarono all’interno della stampa serigrafica, accorgendosi quindi del potenziale giro d’affari che la t – shirt garantiva, come fece Sherry Manufacturing Company (Miami) che inizio’ con la stampa su sciarpe e considerata oggi come una delle piu’ grandi e importanti compagnie serigrafiche in Florida.
Nel tardo 1960, l’introduzione della stampa serigrafica garantisce il successo della t-shirt come accessorio della moda e l’invenzione del Plastisol (inchiostro usato per la stampa opacca nel tessuto scuro), consenti molta piu’ varieta’ nel uso del design sulla maglia. Sempre nello stesso anno l’apparizione della Ringer T-shirt diventa il prodotto principale nella moda tra i giovani e rock-n-roller.La t-shirt diventa veicolo per pubblicizzare eventi sociali e battaglie politiche. Essa diventa quindi un mezzo per l’espressione della propria personalita’ e pubblicita’, includendo parole, arte, illustrazioni e fotografia.
Tra gli anni 60-70, la T-shirt assume aspetti e motivi sempre piu’ legati a culture e correnti di pensiero, come e’ avvenuto quando in quel decennio la T-shirt sosteneva la faccia del rivoluzionario marxista Che Guevara e la musica capitalizza la popolarita’ della t-shirt. Le rock bands iniziano a vendere le loro t-shirt ai concerti con immagini e slogans.
Per i tre giorni del Monterey Pop Festival (16-18 giugno 1967, California), nel 100% cotone spiccano nomi come quello degli Yardbirds, Led Zeppeling, Beatles, Who, commercializzando il tutto a sostegno di Charity Organisation.
Nel 1977 il Dipartimento di Stato del Commercio newyorkese vuole promuovere il proprio territorio creando il proprio logo “I love NY”, stampandolo prima sulla maglia e poi utilizzando altri materiali. Il logo piu’ imitato nella storia che e’ diventato il simbolo dell’America all’estero fu disegnato e offerto da Milton Glaser, allora designer di NY Magazine.
Tra gli anni 80 e 90, le T-shirt con prominenti nomi di stilisti e designer diventarono popolari specialmente tra i giovani adulti. Ecco allora che noti stilisti come Kelvin Klain, Fubu, Ralph Lauren e Gap, acconsentirono i loro consumatori di avere per costi piu’ accessibili le t-shirt, promovendo cosi il loro brand e la loro campagna marketing.

Calling Cuba - It doesn't have to be expensive.

As many of you know … calling Cuba isn’t always easy. In addition to the line quality, cost is a major problem. Some providers deliberately keep the cost high … or attach extra hidden fees.

Some of the hidden fees are …

  • Connection fee
  • Weekly fee
  • Call rounding – usually to the 3rd minute
  • False billing

We do not believe in this way of billing customers.  Hence we don’t charge those hidden fees.  Our billing is always by the second.   If your call is 45 seconds long, thats all we charge for.   Plus none of those hidden charges. Our rates are reasonable as well (starting around 95 cents/minute in USA).   If you are interested in our service, please email us at   services[at]vsmsmail.com

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Second Amendment: Handgun Bans

Lawyer, Alan Gura

Yesterday the Chicago supreme court granted Alan Gura, a constitutional lawyer, the right to address them on their ban of hand guns. Alan Gura also addressed the DC ban on hand guns recently. Both these bans are direct violation of the constitutional right to “bear arms.” Banning hand guns also do not lower gun crime rates. In 1982, a survey of imprisoned criminals found that 34% of them had been “scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim.”

In Chicago, murder rates were up over the same time frame last year. The number of homicides from when they past the hand gun ban and now have risen from:

2007: 442 2008: 510

Doesn’t seem all that effective to me?  Washington DC also passed a hand gun ban in 1976. “Between 1976 and 1991, Washington D.C.’s homicide rate rose 200%, while the U.S. rate rose 12%.” Total offenses involving handguns in England have risen since 1997. Crimes involving firearms have more than doubled since the gun ban in 1997 as well. Also in Canada, the “breaking and entering” crime rate rose 25% after the 1977 law preventing handgun use for self defense. Since 1998, the number of people injured by firearms in England and Wales increased by 110%, from 2,378 in 1998/99 to 5,001 in 2005/0

Facts: http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp#Crime%20and%20Self%20Defense

As cliche as it seems it is true “guns don’t kill people, people do.” Rather than banning all guns, which is shown not to work, how about more strict penalties for violating gun laws? If a criminal wants to commit a crime with a gun, he is going to get a gun. End of story. Whether he has to buy it on the street or in the store. Not to mention its in direct violation of our constitution. Not only that, but Thomas Jefferson also stressed the importance of gun ownership by citizens. “What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.”  –Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, 1787.”  James Madison in the Federalist Papers also backs the importance of the second amendment. “To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence.” Madison shows there that the militia, which is often used as an argument against gun control, is chosen by themselves.

Then again, these are just old, obsolete thinkers and the constitution is a living document right? According to President Obama it is.

OH NO?! Not the evil, hate mongering nut job Glenn Beck? This video must be wrong. It’s clips of their own voices and their own quotes, its just facts. And that’s that.

Retaliate Against Alex Jones’ Treacherous Psychological Warfare!

The following made it’s way to our little website by way of Rocktown Rebel.

AN INSULT TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL

On occasion, this blog will be compelled to comment on events that occur outside of our corner of the “prison planet”, this is one of those occasions.

We have it on good knowledge that amongst the several hundred anarchists present at Pittsburgh this past weekend were at least two Virginians. Two individuals who we the authors have been personally acquainted with in the past. Neither of these individuals were natives of the Blue Ridge area, and thus had no reason to inject themselves with unbridled loyalty and commitment into the local political struggles of the region, sacrificing time, money, energy, and safety to help their friends and neighbors. Yet they did so anyway at every opportunity, acting out of genuine camaraderie and the unrelenting sway of their ethical compasses.

These two individuals, like the majority of the g-20 disruptors in Pittsburgh last weekend, are anarchists. They were among those who put their bodies on the front-lines in New Orleans after Katrina, when the public authorities “were too busy cleaning up the tourist areas of the French Quarter and protecting shops to help the poorer city dwellers”. They were among those who worked year after year anonymously scaffolding virtually every libertarian project in the Blue Ridge, and, unlike other local activists, never cashed in, never sought prominence, celebrity, the spotlight of book-signing tours and self-aggrandizing Internet communiques. And in Pittsburgh, they were among the brave souls bombarded with the technocracy’s chemical and sound weapons for standing up, for refusing to allow business-as-usual to operate.

Alex Jonze gonna knock you out!

That these comrades of ours, and the hundreds like them, would be subject to the most obscene of slanders by those media agents who proclaim with great vigor to speak on behalf of Obama’s “free market”, of the global world order; this is of utterly no surprise. When  self-appointed activist leaders, such as Alex Jones, stab in the backs the working-class grunts who make possible the mass-movements they parasitize off of,  out of no motivation other than sheer cynicism and opportunism, to create a publicity stunt to generate more interest in their bankrupt channels of official dissent, when this happens the waters become murkier. Ambiguity and uncertainty are exploited, manipulated, and above all expanded and proliferated. The wells of communication are poisoned. And for what?

We will not degrade ourselves, stooping down to the level of dogs, by pedantically correcting every egregious factual error in the article entitled “Provocateur Cops Caught Disguised As Anarchists At G20″ on Alex Jones’ “Prison Planet” website. We leave this to the myriad other anarchist bloggers who have already jumped at the opportunity to volunteer with such an endeavor.

This is the same news service, after all, that, forgoing an opportunity for rational analysis of the situation, reported that Virginia Tech shooter Cho Seung-Hui was a “Mind Controlled Assassin“  on the flimsiest of evidence; the fact that Mr.  Seung-Hui, like many of his fellow-workers, was on anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs, and a photograph of an East-Asian man, who may or may not be Mr. Seung-Hui, posing in marine fatigues, available for a reasonable price at any military surplus store.

This is where we, as rednecks, as Virginia patriots, as workers of the world, come from when we denounce Alex Jones. Cho Seung-Hui, fellow Virginian, fellow worker, was not a “mind controlled assassin”, but a sad, lonely individual who was driven to senseless and malicious violence by a lifetime of sexual abuse, racial harassment, institutionalized marginalization,  and social isolation. His victims, all fellow Virginians, all fellow workers, were not martyred by a grand sinister conspiracy, but by the senseless and chaotic cluster-fuck known as life under capitalism. In the face of a calamity that rippled through our communities like a shock-wave, Jones’ cronies rushed to the presses with the most sensationalistic lie their imaginations could innovate, with the sole purpose of capitalizing off of our suffering.

This alone is enough to denounce Alex Jones, to discredit him entirely as a source of factual journalism. Yet it’s far from the extent of Jones & co.’s crimes:

  • In the face of courageous proletarian mass-uprisings in ‘05, Jones penned a piece entitled French Riots: Plan Engineered by Globalists, a racist tirade which claimed that “the mainly Algerian Muslims causing the chaos hate the country that has afforded them a greater living standard than their birthplace ever could”, and that “the melting pot of multiculturalism does not work, it has never worked and it was never intended to work. The Algerians in France do not want to be part of the Western fabric because they fundamentally hate it to its very core. This is not helped by promotion of decadent and hedonistic lifestyles pumped out from every cultural and media orifice.”
  • Time after time, Alex Jones has pushed the white nationalist line on U.S.-Mexican immigration, siding with the Minutemen over anti-fascists, featuring Lou Dobbs and other “MSM” anti-immigrant gate-keepers on his website, claiming that “the elite are using the enraged Mexican mobs as a weapon of conquest to slit America’s throat and sacrifice its sovereignty on the altar of globalism” as well as implement a “blueprint for race-based genocide directed against blacks and whites in America” in order to turn the U.S. into “a third world cesspit”, falsely claiming in order to generate white supremacist angst and terror that the sell-outs and bureaucrats at La Raza are “reconquista” radicals, updating his website with headlines such as “Illegals targeted South Carolina sheriff as gang-initiation“, and so on. (Rest assured, we at Rocktown Rebel are playing the world’s smallest violin for the South Carolina sheriff)
  • Alex Jones charges $1500 a month for advertising on his various websites. Among his past clientele include “Scriptures for America”, an organization headed by notorious “Christian Identity” pastor Pete Peters,  who once asked, rhetorically: “Is there a Jewish conspiracy against America? Do Jews control America’s media? Do Jews have a death grip on America’s government? [...] Do Jews prevent a free press in America? Are Jews against freedom in America? Do Jews want total people control? Are Jews liars? Do Jews want to put America under tyranny? Must Jews leave America if America is to survive?” Book titles available on the  Scriptures for America online catalog include Martin Luther King, Jr.: His Dream, Our Nightmare, Death Penalty for Homosexuals is Prescribed in the Bible, Interracial Marriage – Right or Wrong?, My Personal Experience with Jewish Power, and Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel’s The Six Million Holocaust.
  • On one episode of his radio show, a caller stated “It it is incorrect to call a modern day Jew an Israelite. They are not Israelites, they are ‘Israe-Lies’. [...] The ‘true Israel’ is ‘ the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, Germanic and kindred people, commonly called the white race, which has been demonized.” Alex concurred, explaining that it’s “true that about 80-85[%] [...]  of Jewish people are Khazarian”, and that “80% of Jews are a mix of Germanic and Asian, whereas your mainline Semitic Arabs are a mix of Negro, Caucasian, and Asian”, going on to explain that ” you have the Caucasoids, the Negroids, the Asians, and those are your three major groups”.
  • Other featured on Jones’ various websites include “6-Year-Old Boy Raised By Homosexuals Wants to Kill Himself”, “Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution”, and “Unmentionable Vice [referring to homosexuality] Goes Mainstream”.
  • Jones has professional relationships with Holocaust denier Mike “whatreallyhappened.com” Rivero and anti-Semitic fascist pastor Texe Marrs
  • Jones is able to afford to live in an affluent Austin suburb due to his sale of overpriced Infowars and Prison Planet DVDs, T-shirts, baseball caps, bracelets, and other mass-produced merchandise. (As the blog we stole this from put it, “there’s a war on…for your wallet!”)
  • Jones co-operated with an FBI subpoena for a list of InfoWars readers’ IP addresses after a Roanoke man used his site to threaten police officers. Jones explained that he’s “not [...] happily handing over peoples’ IP addresses” but that threatening law enforcement “isn’t a joke”.

All this creates a context for Jones & co.’s latest deception. That context is psychological warfare against the libertarian left by parasitic right-wing third positionists who advocate anti-Semitism, racialist nationalism, schizophrenic masonic/Illuminati conspiracy theories, anti-feminism, and totalitarian-minded moral crusades, whose leaders sell this madness and disinformation to live comfortably as others starve. Far too long has this incessant milieu slandered us from afar, while infiltrating us and recruiting our ranks from within. Too much amnesty has been given within our camp to Jones and his accomplices,  as if they were some lesser force of fascism in comparison to the Identity militias, the Klan, the skinheads, the Minutemen. At the forefront of our vision now stands this unavoidable fact: the only difference between Jones & co. and these other forces of fascism is a more pronounced aura of tact and sophistication on the part of the former.

Therefore

  • We must retaliate against Alex Jones & co. by sapping their life-force :  the deceived and misguided masses who stand behind them. We must all the same sneaky tricks – infiltration, tact, subterfuge – in winning their ranks over as has been done to us by them in the recent past.
  • We must retaliate against Alex Jones & co. by doing anything within our capabilities of preventing their lies and slander from being further propagated.
  • We must retaliate against Alex Jones & co. by no longer allowing them to politically operate in our local communities on any level. (This point is of especial relevance to our Texan comrades)
  • Finally, we must never allow the capitalist journalists and activist-bureaucrat leaders, such as those present during the confrontation in Pittsburgh, (Jones, Shehan, the Daily Show, et. al) to walk amongst our ranks without ridicule and vocal denunciation.